0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Áß³â±â À§±â°¨¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿äÀÎ

Influencing Factors on Mid-Life Crisis

¼ºÀΰ£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2018³â 30±Ç 1È£ p.98 ~ 105
KMID : 0367020180300010098
ÀåÇý°æ ( Chang Hae-Kyung ) - ÇѼ­´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe the factors which may influence a reported mid-life crisis.

Methods: The research design was a descriptive survey design using a convenience sampling. Data were collected from 209 middle aged men and women by using self-reported questionnaires including Korean versions of Mid-life Crisis Scale, Meaning in Life Questionnaire, Perceived Stress Scale, Ego-resiliency Scale and Multipledimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Data were analyzed using the SPSS/WIN 22.0 program for descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlation coefficients and hierarchical multiple regression.

Results: The mean for mid-life crisis was 2.69¡¾0.58. A mid-life crisis was statistically significant in relationship to education (F=3.79, p=.024) and to economic status (F=4.07, p=.019). Further, there were significant correlations among meaning of life (r=?.34, p<.001), health status (r=?.42, p<.001), stress (r=.46, p<.001), ego resilience (r=?.29, p<.001), social support (r=?.47, p<.001), and mid-life crisis. Social support (¥â=?.29, p<.001), stress (¥â=.27, p<.001), and health status (¥â=?.22, p<.001) were significant predictors which explained 34% of the variance reported in a mid-life crisis.

Conclusion: The results indicate that these factors influencing mid-life crisis should be considered when developing nursing intervention to cope with a mid-life crisis.
KeyWords
°Ç°­»óÅÂ, ÀÚ¾Æ, »çȸÀû ÁöÁö, Áß³â±â
Health status, Ego, Social support, Middle age
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed